Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 13:20

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
2025 NBA Finals: 4 things to watch for in Game 3 - NBA
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Turning carbon dioxide into fuel just got easier, thanks to acid bubbles - Tech Xplore
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What's the deal with black women who wear straight hair or go bald?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Kate Middleton Shares a Rare Family Photo After Trooping the Colour - instyle.com
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What are some things you do for your form of self-care?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Travis Hunter gets his full $30.57 million signing bonus up front - NBC Sports